Criticizing the Norwegian legal system’s treatment of Patriots after WW2

Treatment of Norwegian Patriots after WW2

Part 6

Norwegian History during WW2

Volume 2

Dear Aryan Kindred

In none of the occupied European countries was the legal treatment of patriots after WW2 as cruel and unconstitutional as in Norway.

In Norway over 3 per cent of the adult population were legally prosecuted. In none of the European countries were so many people sentenced to death and executed per capita as in Norway.

In Holland the legal prosecution after WW2 was handled by a special commission, but in Norway it was the ordinary juridical system that handled all prosecutions. Holland has admited that its treatments were unconstitutional.

You may ask yourselves why. My answer is the Jews. By reading all my letters on Norwegian history you will learn that Arbeiderparti, The Labour Party, had borrowed money from Soviet Union during the 20's to start a revolution. Some of the money was confiscated by the Norwegian Military Special Branch. Vidkun Quisling during his time as Secretary of Defence in 1930 revealed this. Knowing that the Jews were the masters of Soviet Union and knowing they financed the Russian Revolution it is easy to see what a grip the Jews had on the Arbeiderparti. They had not paid back the loan of 2 million NOK (1930) equal to at least 26 Million NOK or 3.5 Million US$ to day. With such a grip and the grip which the Jews got on the exile government during WW2 there is no doubt in my mind that it was the Jews who were holding all cards in Norway after WW2. In addition to this one must remember that the President of the Norwegian Storting, Parliament, was the Jew Hambro.

As the temporary decrees which were to be used for convicting Norwegian patriots after WW2 were known a lot of the best jurists of Norway protested and said the temporary decrees were unconstitutional and could not be used. Further at least one barrister-at-law, Harald Holthe, even said Norway was not at war with Germany after June 10, 1940 as Norway had capitulated on that day. Holthe had said so during WW2, now he said it after May 8, 1945. Nobody among the leading politicians and members of Hjemmefront (Home Front) wanted to listen to Holthe.

Another man, professor Jon Skeie, the leading person in jurisprudence attacked the temporary decrees. Professor Skeie even edited a paper in which he described why the temporary decrees could not be used. Skeie printed and published his paper in the summer of 1945.

A lot of persons lined up with a woman called Marta Steinsvik as she published a booklet condemning the attacks on members of NS, Nasjonal Samling, and the temporary decrees. Mrs Steinsvik even showed terror used during the imprisonment of NS-members. Mrs Steinsvik’s booklet came out in 3 editions.

The most devastating blow towards the temporary decrees and the decisions which Norwegian courts had given came from Sweden in 1956- The Norwegian Court Decision or The Swedish Report as the popular name of the report among members of NS - is the name this devastation blow is known under. A Swedish firm of lawyers, most of them teachers at the University of Stockholm and specialists on international laws, Institut foer Offentlig och Internationell Raett, wrote a report on the legality of the temporary decrees based on Norwegian legal code of March 1940. This report said none of the decisions made by the Norwegian courts were according to Norwegian laws or international laws.

The Swedish Report was paid for by members of NS and was meant to be helping them to get new court decisions for the members. The report was given to every member of Stortinget, the Norwegian parliament. A lot of the parliamentarians from all political parties said after reading the report: They wanted to support a settlement which gave the NS-members new lawsuits, but this was before the various political parties had met to discuss the mater. After all meetings only a few politicians supported the former NS-members. Most of the parliamentarians during the discussion that the court decisions against the NS-members had been according to Norwegian laws and just.

By the late 1960's a historian, Sverre Hartmann, wrote some books and a series in a monthly paper, Aktuell, where he said things which were against the official historical understanding. He said that General Ruge had capitulated after being told to do so by The Norwegian King, Haakon 7. Hartmann also brought other "unknown" paper to the public. All these papers supported the historical views which the NS-members had. The monthly paper was owned by The Labour Party and the Norwegian Federation of Trade Unions, Landsorganisasjonen. To the sorrow of Hartmann and the NS-members the politicians and the other historian did nothing.

A lot of the NS-members wrote books where they desecrated the legal treatment given to the followers of Quisling. I have above only given you a few of the names of those not a NS-members who said they did not agree with what the government had done to the NS-members. The best books written by a NS-member were the books of Peder Harsem. Harsem had been a member long before the war, and he lost all his money as a consequence of the injustice laws and sentence which he got. In the beginning of 1950's the former members started a monthly mews paper called Folk og Land, People and Country. In this news paper they fought for their rights. They sent the news paper to all parliamentarians, but none of them acted as expected of them. As the old members died the news paper were taken over by the younger members, young men who had been part of the voluntaries in Waffen-SS during WW2. Now the news paper got a new face and new stories, it concentrated its effeort in telling histories from the war time experience of the soldiers, but also on telling what happened in Norway in the time before WW2.

In one of his books Peder Harsem told about the public prosecutor Hafting who by late 1949 lost his job because he had been accused of sexual misbehaviour. Mr Hafting had been sexually attacking young boys and girls. Further Mr Hafting had been engaged in mistreatment of young boys. As the news of Mr Hafting was known many NS-members wanted new trails, because they claimed a criminal had been prosecuting them. Further they wanted a new trail because Mr Hafting had not helped them as they reported mistreatment during imprisonment. Hafting had in numerous letters to the various counsels for NS-members said he did not want to hear about such accusations. As it then was revealed that Mr Hafting was a lover of mistreatment the NS-members and their counsels hoped for new trials or at least alleviation in the conditions under which the NS-members served their imprisonments. But no, the judges did not want to help. Letters to the Norwegian Director of Public Prosecutions are not answered when one wants to know why they did not help the NS-members who had been mistreated by a sexual sadist.

As the 60's turned into the 70's Norwegian television and US-movies started to give much attention to the Jewish problem - Norwegian heard about how "bad" the Jews were treated during WW2. Schools started to tell the pupils about the nasty Germans who had gassed Jews by the millions in concentration camps in Poland during WW2. Even Norwegians who had been imprisoned during WW2 as spices started to write books telling about how the Jews were treated.

As a consequence of the attention given to the Jews it was impossible for the NS-members to get any attention to their cases. As the Jewish propaganda went on Norwegian NS-members were looked upon as Nazis, Nazis who killed Jews, This was even the case for Norwegians who never had seen a Jew neither before nor during WW2.

A lot of the children of NS-members had experienced a hell on earth after WW2. Some of them wanted attention to their problems, but NO even these children were looked upon as killers of Jews. (In my next letter I will tell you the story of some of these children.)

By the 80's it was impossible to bring up a new look at the NS-members and their juridical bad luck. Every time they tried they met the fortune of the jews - the gassing.

A Norwegian historian, Hans Fredrikk Dahl, wrote a book on Quisling, but the book - a very good one - was met as an attempt to clear Quisling from the name as Jew-killer.

Many a book has been written about Quisling - but none as good as Dahl’s book.

To-day the NS-members are being pursued by the leftish and other semi-communist groups. They had an office which wasset on fire a couple of years ago. Since these old men and women want no attention they closed the office and left their archive to the state archive.

A few time they have been given access to discussions on the television, but each time they have been accused of collaboration with the German SS during WW2. This even if the discussions were about events that happened long before the war.

Yes, Norway has turned into a stronghold for World Jewry.

When once the Norwegians have learned what the Jews have done to their country and citizens I know the Norwegians will take revenge against the Jews. I only do not know when this will happen. I feel sorry for the state of Norway and what she has gotten into. I only wish she can soon get rid of the Jews living inside her borders.

To Norway it has been a calamity that her politicians in 1850 abolished the paragraph in the Constitution saying Jews had no access to the country.

Heil og sael

Julius