THE ORIGINS OF THE HOLOHOAX MONEY SPINNER
The Jewish clamour for sympathy and mega-bucks actually began during World
War I and accelerated through the mid-1920s. During those years Jewish
interest groups throughout the world but especially in the United States
spread the falsehood that millions of their tribe were suffering in Europe.
Their propaganda claimed that millions had died already while many millions
more would suffer a lingering death. Bear in mind that the Jewish population,
according to the World Jewish Almanac, was only 13 million. Who says
resurrection doesn't exist. The Chosen People are resurrected time after
time, during the one lifetime even.
The New York Times coined the key words; 'extermination', 'holocaust', 'six
million' and the bucks cascaded in. The extortion abated a little during the
thirties but picked up speed through the war years. So successful was it
that the entire State of Israel was financed by holocaust 'reparations' and
Only in the western world is credence given to the allies most successful
and profitable propaganda initiative, the myth of six million gassed Jews,
the compensation of which keeps the state Israel just about solvent. It sure
beats finding oil as a profitable industry.
Professor Robert Faurrisson who is better qualified than any tabloid
reporter to comment on such matters was quite forthright. "Despite thousands
of detailed documents on the crematoria built to dispose of the bodies of
typhus victims, not a single piece of documentary evidence has ever been
produced to substantiate the existence of even one gas chamber; not an order
for construction, a plan, an invoice, or a photograph. During the hundreds
of 'war crimes' trials, nothing could be produced. There were no gas
chambers at Auschwitz or anywhere else in wartime Europe. On that I state my
reputation and career."
He certainly wasn't alone and in all fairness. Jews, many of them prominent,
have criticized the WHY THE LIES? over-egging of their 'fate'. Joseph
Ginsburg a German-based Jewish survivor and researcher said, "Why then are
they, the Israelis, obstructing all honest research into the six million
question? All statistics will so long be controversial until world Jewry and
Zionism will be willing to present to the public exact official statistics
of the losses. The roadblock to research is due to the fact that from six
million dead one can extract far more reparations than from say 6,000."
Stephen F. Pinter writing in The Sunday Visitor (June 14th 1959). "I
was in Dachau for 17 months after the war, as a U.S. War Department Attorney,
and I can state that there were no gas chambers at Dachau. What was shown to
visitors and sightseers there and erroneously described as a gas chamber was
a crematory. Nor was there a gas chamber in any other the other
concentration camps in Germany.
We were told that there was a gas chamber at Auschwitz, but since this was
in the Russian zone of occupation, we were not permitted to investigate
since the Russians would not allow it. From what I was able to determine in
six years of post-war Germany and Austria, there were a number of Jews
killed, but the figure of a million was certainly never reached.
He added, "I interviewed thousands of Jews, former inmates of concentration
camps in Germany and Austria, and consider myself as well qualified on the
subject as any man."
Although millions of gassings are said to have occurred, 'no one has ever
been charged with murder by gassing. That is, no one has ever been charged
with operating the alleged gas chambers," surmised John Bennett, Secretary
of the Victoria Council for Civil Liberties.
WHY THE CONFUSION?
Why the confusion? After all, we are familiar with pictures of mounds of
emaciated bodies piled high at some - not all - German internment camps.
Equally undeniably there are countless photographs, even on display at
Dachau today, that show well-clad inmates in obvious good health right up to
release. Those doing manual work are also wearing padded gloves to protect
their hands. These pictures are on open display. Even pictures taken at
Belsen right after the war's end clearly show perfectly healthy inmates
strolling among the emaciated dead.
How then does this explain a Nazi program of genocidal intention being so
patchy in its application? These unfortunate people died not as a
consequence of intent but by the ravages of typhus and cholera.
In fact photographs such as those taken at Bergen-Belsen could have been
taken anywhere in Central Europe at the time, which was devastated by
nightly allied 1,000 bomber raids and total war. Millions of civilians of
many nations, Germans included, died through starvation and disease
resulting in similar mounds of emaciated corpses.
After four years of saturation American and British 'burnt earth' bomber
raids all German road communications had been destroyed and no supplies had
reached concentration camps or anywhere else for that matter. Typhoid fever
ensued and hundreds of prisoners, mostly Eastern European prisoners-of-war
had died as a consequence. The allies arrived on the scene and found a
terrible situation. These conditions were described fully in The Golden
Horizon published by Weidenfeld and Nicholson of London.
THE TRUE CAUSE OF CONCENTRATION CAMP DEATHS
"The German Army at Bergen had forewarned the British that a full-blown
epidemic of typhus had broken out among the prisoners in the camp." (In
The Ruins of the Reich, George Allen & Unwin. London, 1985).
In appendix 'O' Chapter. V11, The Second Army History we read, "Disease
of all kinds was rife and in a vast number of cases it was difficult to tell
which disease predominated whether it was typhus, starvation, tubercle or a
combination of all three, which was responsible for the shattered wrecks of
human beings who formed the majority of the inmates.
The Daily Mail (London) reporting from 'liberated' Czechoslovakia six
months after the war's end said, "A typhus epidemic now rages amongst them,
(German civilian prisoners) and they are said to be dying at the rate of 100
In liberated France a year after Germany's defeat it was common knowledge. "There
is a typhoid epidemic in the French camp holding German POWs which has
already spread to the neighboring village." and, "The only difference I can
see between these men (German POWs) and those corpses is that here they are
still breathing," wrote Henry Griffin, the Associated Press photographer who
had taken Buchenwald and Dachau pictures.
BRITISH CAMPS WORSE THAN BELSEN
It was the same in British administered camps in postwar Belgium. There,
British Army officers said, "Conditions are not much better than they were
So how is it that these awful conditions and far worse are perfectly
acceptable when the allies are responsible for them, but not for German camp
administrators? The latter can at least claim that the conditions their
inmates endured occurred during and not after the war? It would be justice
indeed if the Germans today were to charge the allies with concentration
camp genocide! They would have a far stronger case than the allies should
they do so.
Invariably when allied pictures of concentration camp victims are shown they
are propaganda linked 'as proof' that the Germans had a policy of
extermination. But by separating reality from the victors' propaganda the
scale of the fraud becomes clear.
The propagandists have been in retreat since 1945 when all camps were said
to be extermination camps but in the light of scientific and objective
analysis shown to be nothing of the kind.
Let's take a peek at the memorial plaque that was unveiled at Dachau by
Philip Auerbach, the Jewish State Secretary of the Bavarian Government. The
plaque at the time read: 'This area is being retained as a shrine to the
238,000 individuals who were cremated here.' But since then, this figure
has consistently been revised downwards to its present total of 20,600, who
it appears died from typhus and starvation - mostly after the war's end!
JEWISH SHYSTER CONVICTED – BUT WHAT ABOUT THE REST?
As an interesting and wry footnote it can be revealed that this Jewish
shyster, Philip Auerbach, has since been convicted for embezzling money
which he claimed for non-existent Jews.
In an equally fancy piece of propagandist footwork it is now claimed that
all the actual extermination camps coincidentally happen to be situated in
those parts of Germany and Poland occupied by the Soviets.
So-called German death camps are now as difficult to find as today's weapons
of mass disappearance in Iraq (and Libya).
Dr. Martin Broszat, the anti-Nazi Director of the Institute of Contemporary
History in Munich, who can lay claim to being a major influence on the
genocide issue, admitted in Die Zeit (August 19th 1960) that there
were no extermination camps on German soil and that instead, one had to look
'above all to Auschwitz (situated in Communist Poland).
How convenient then that this last redoubt of the propagandists was occupied
by the Red Army, which was a bit of a dab hand at genocide itself. They
never allowed outside inspection of the camp until 10 years after the war's
Gita Sereny, the Jewish holocaust historian ruefully admits that,
"Auschwitz, despite its emblematic name, was NOT primarily an extermination
camp for the Jews and is not the central case through which to study
extermination." (The New Statesman, November 2 1979).
"THE TRUTH IS IRRELEVANT"
As a delightful slice of Jewish chutzpah Dr. Raul Hilberg in the Los Angeles
Times (February 23 1989) wrote, "A report that an Auschwitz building could
not have been designed as a gas chamber is true but irrelevant."
So there you are. The truth is irrelevant. Well it would be where shekels,
and dollars and lots and lots of Deutsch marks are concerned.
Equally candid was Dr. Hans-Heinrich Wilhelm of the University of Riga who
in 1988 wrote: "Our detailed research however mostly establishes only how
shaky is the ground we're on: the consensus of research data often turns out
only to be the result of everybody having uncritically copied what everybody
else was writing.
The actual documentary basis on many matters is frighteningly narrow and is
in consequence easily shattered by some find or other. In all too many
matters we are still groping in total darkness. If we are to avert being
shown up, in the next few years historical research is going to have to do
all it can not only to establish better documentary defenses but
broader-based ones as well."
Nor do the guilt trips end there. Listen to Shmuel Krakowski, the Director
of Archives at the Holocaust Memorial, Yad Vashem in Palestine (sorry,
Israel): "A large number of testimonials on file here were later proved to
be inaccurate when locations and dates could not pass an expert historian's
There are many claims that more Jews were gassed than there were Jews in
existence throughout the entire world. So how did they arrive at these
ridiculous figures? Because 'survivor' evidence has been shown to be
consistently fraudulent the propagandists have had no choice but to fall
back on the 'evidence' of two prominent German internment camp
administrators to support their claims. Rudolf Hoess was Commandant of
Auschwitz from 1940 until his arrest by the British Army in 1945.
BEATEN AND TORTURED
The camp administrator should have taken his own life as did many others. He
was subjected to the most horrendous beatings (with axe handles), was
tortured and brain-washed that, 'his testimony at Nuremberg was delivered
in a mindless monotone as he stared blankly into space.'
Even Reitlinger regarded his testimony as hopelessly untrustworthy; a
catalogue of wild exaggerations. These included his declaration that 16,000
Jews a day was disposed of - which would have meant 13 million in total.
Just short of the world's official total Jewish population of 15 million!
Private Ken Jones (Fifth Royal Horse Artillery) of Wrexham in Wales
described what happened when Hoess was brought in for 'interrogation'. Two
other soldiers were detailed with Private Jones and they said, "We sat in
the cell with him night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod
him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance."
He added, "When Hoess was taken out for exercise he was made to wear only
jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. The prisoner was
simultaneously being starved. After three days and nights without sleep,
Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities."
Or did he? His statement appears in American English idiom yet there is no
evidence that Rudolf Hoess could speak English at all. So who really did
write this 'confession'?
Tried at Nuremberg and handed over to the Polish Communists in 1947 he was
ordered to write the story of his life, which was published as Wspomniena
in the Polish language. It is said that the hand- written original exists -
but no one has ever seen it.
BRITISH AND AMERICAN WRITERS USE TORTURE 'EVIDENCE'
The other major player was the obscenely tortured Oswald Pohl of the Economy
and Administration Office. "Pohl had signed some incriminating statements
after being subjected to severe torture including a bogus admission that he
had seen a gas chamber at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944," This much was
conceded by U.S. Senator McCarthy.
Let us be candid about it. In the eyes of God every writer who has used the
'evidence' of these and other tortured prisoners is every bit as guilty and
as sick-minded as the actual torturers. 'Evidence' through torture is no
evidence at all.
The French Marxist and rabidly anti-Nazi Professor Paul Rassinier was
arrested by the Germans during the war and interned at Buchenwald and Dora
concentration camps between 1943 and 1945. Yet he has always been at the
forefront in disproving the allegations of genocide. He wrote, "I was in
Auschwitz from January, 1944 until December, 1944. After the war I heard
about the mass murders supposedly perpetrated by the SS against the Jewish
prisoners and I was perfectly astonished. There were no secrets at
The post war French Premier Leon Blum, Jewish to his marrow was in
Buchenwald Camp for two years from April 1943 to April 1945. During this
time his official biographer, Professor Louise Dalby, reports that he was
never 'even ill treated," except for the restriction on his liberty.
WHAT A STRANGE OMISSION
How odd that there is not a single mention of gas chambers in General Dwight
Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe, Winston Churchill's The Second
World War or Charles deGaulle's Memoires de Guerre. Perhaps the
powers in the new world order only thought about gas chambers afterwards
when they realised that here was the perfect tool to make the Germans appear
even blacker than themselves, thus justifying allied war crimes. Further,
here was the opportunity to milk the German economy – and pay for the
setting up of the new Israeli State in 1948 and pay 'Dane gelt' to more 'survivors'
than could possibly have existed. There is certainly no business like Shoah
(Yiddish for Holocaust) business.
Little wonder that the acclaimed English writer Auberon Waugh felt obliged
to ask, "Are the truths on which the Holocaust relies so flimsy that they
need smears to protect them, coupled with prison sentences like those now
imposed in Germany, Austria, and France...?"
THE LETTER FROM HELL
A newspaper in the USA published the following letter from G. W. Hasse of
Rancho Cucamonga, California. It is an eyewitness account of Allied
propaganda versus the truth.
"In September 1945 I had the opportunity to speak with a German POW who had
gone through a re-education program (a euphemism for brainwashing in
exchange for ration tickets) at the large POW camp neat Attiche, France,
located about 50 miles north east of Paris. The prisoners there had been
shown a film depicting Nazi soldiers burying partially incinerated bodies of
women and children as proof of the Nazi perpetrated holocaust.
To his amazement, this POW recognised himself as one of the soldiers in the
burying detail. This was surprising because he had never been in a
In fact, the film had been shot at Dresden by the German propaganda media to
show Allied atrocities. I remember the incident reported in the spring of
1945 in the Army newspaper The Stars and Stripes, with the front page
headline: '250,000 Nazis killed.'
EXHIBITION OF ATROCITIES CLOSED DOWN
Another burden that a defeated nation must bear is to see its history
completely distorted by the victor nations. In Germany it is a serious
offence to question the propaganda of the victors. There are occasional
A highly publicised German exhibition of atrocities allegedly carried out by
regular German army forces during the Second World War was closed down in
the wake of revelations that many of the harrowing photographs displayed are
bogus. The organisers of "War of Annihilation: Crimes of the German Armed
Forces, 1941-1944," announced the shutdown on November 5, 1999, after
evidence had come to light proving that much of the controversial exhibit is
Since 1995 hundreds of thousands of visitors had viewed the exhibition,
which appeared in more than 30 German and Austrian cities. Numerous
secondary school classes were guided through it. Many of Germany's most
prominent social, political and business personalities endorsed the exhibit,
which was designed to prove that regular German army (Wehrmacht) troops, and
not just SS soldiers, carried out "Holocaust" killings of Jews and others.
Most of the approximately 800 photographs in the exhibition were from
Soviet-era Russian sources. More than half of the total is non-incriminating
while most of the 34 photos proven to be fraudulent or misrepresented
actually show victims of the Soviets and of other non-German forces.
Exhibition organiser Hannes Herr also admitted that some of the photographs
had been retouched. In some instances, photos taken from different angles of
the same event or scene were displayed at different places in the exhibition
with captions telling viewers that they showed atrocities at different
locations. Also presented in the exhibition were documents that included
phoney confessions by Germans that had been extracted under torture from
Because German scholars were reluctant to expose the fraudulent nature of
the exhibits, it was left to two non-German scholars, one Polish and one
Hungarian to do so. Afterwards a few emboldened Germans felt able to voice
criticisms. Prof. Hans Moeller, for one, director of the Institute for
Contemporary History in Munich, acknowledged that the exhibition was full of
errors, adding that it would be irresponsible to show it in the United
The shutdown postponed indefinitely the scheduled debut of an
English-language version of the exhibition in New York City. Organisers
announced their intention to re-open the exhibition after re-checking each
of the hundreds of photographs.
Bogdán Musial, a Polish historian who works at the German Historical
Institute in Warsaw established that some of the exhibit's most gruesome
photographs, allegedly depicting German army killings of Jews, in reality
showed victims of mass killings by the Soviet security police (NKVD).
SOVIET PROPAGANDA USED BY THE VICTORS
Dr. Musial compares the "Wehrmacht crimes" exhibit to the propaganda of the
Communist regime in Poland. "The strength of this exhibition," he has said,
"lies in the weakness of its critics."
Dr. Musial explains, photographs of unearthed mass graves of Ukrainians and
Poles killed by the Soviets were found by Red Army troops on the bodies of
German soldiers who had fallen on the eastern front. These included some
taken at Zloczów by a junior officer, Richard Worbs, who fell in 1944.
Soviet authorities publicised such photographs as evidence of German
atrocities. These same photos, with their deceitful misrepresentations, were
acquired by the organisers of the German Wehrmacht crimes exhibition for
display to hundreds of thousands of credulous viewers.
In one exhibition photo, Dr. Musial explains, the corpses shown were
actually Ukrainians who had been killed by the Soviet security police in
Borislav (in Galicia, western Ukraine).
The German soldiers seen in the photograph had helped unearth the bodies for
identification. Another exhibition picture allegedly shows victims of a
German massacre in Kraljevo (Serbia) in October 1941. In fact, the victims
were Ukrainians and Poles killed by the Soviet NKVD in late June 1941 in an
Lviv prison courtyard. "The victims were Ukrainians, Poles, Jews, Russians
and German prisoners of war," said Dr. Musial.
AND HOW WELL IT WORKED!
One has to treat the Germans just to 99 times of the lie for the truth; from
the 100th time on they will believe the lie as it were truth." – Lord
Northcliffe, the former correspondent, and later on the British Director of
Propaganda; 24th September 1945, New York.
MOST ATROCITY PHOTOGRAPHS ARE FAKES
Among other apparently damning exhibition photos are some that show German
soldiers standing among corpses "at a pogrom in Tarnopol." In this case as
well, the bodies are actually those of Ukrainian and Polish victims of the
Soviet NKVD, which had been unearthed after the area came under German
When Dr. Musial first made public his criticisms, the Wehrmacht exhibition
organisers sought to silence him with a lawsuit and to discredit him with a
Along with Dr. Musial, Hungarian historian Krisztián Ungváry played a major
role in discrediting the "Wehrmacht crimes" exhibition. The 31-year-old
Budapest scholar, who was named "military historian of the year" in 1998 by
the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, identified additional misrepresentations
in a scholarly article.
In an interview with a Berlin newspaper, Ungváry spoke of "false photographs"
and "false attributions." He said, "90 percent of the exhibition must be
altered." Perhaps ten percent of the exhibition's pictures showed German
atrocities, he estimated, while another ten percent showed atrocities by
Ukrainians, Finns, Hungarians or the Soviets. The remaining photos (about 80
percent of the total), he went on, showed no atrocities or crimes of any
One of the exhibit's most often cited photographs purports to show a German
army execution squad preparing to shoot several young men. In fact, as
Ungváry established, this photo depicts a Hungarian firing squad in the town
of Stari Becej (in Vojvodina, which at the time belonged to Hungary) in the
fall of 1941. At the time there were no German troops in the area. The
doomed men are Communists who had been sentenced to death by a Hungarian
military court for treason, murder and sabotage.
Apart from its overt deceit by misrepresenting authentic photographs, the
exhibition is a propagandistic fraud on a more fundamental level because it
makes sweeping generalisations and fails to provide adequate historical
context. A good example is the exhibit's most familiar photograph (reproduced
on the front cover of Germany's leading news magazine, Der Spiegel), which
shows German soldiers at an execution of several men in April 1941 in
Panchevo, Serbia (Vojvoidina region).
What exhibition visitors were not told is that this was an execution of 18
Yugoslav army fighters who, disguised as civilians, had been involved in
shootings of German soldiers. A military court sentenced them to death. This
execution, however grim, was in conformity with internationally recognised
military law. Not mentioned is the fact that when Yugoslav forces retreated
from Panchevo they took with them nine ethnic German civilians as hostages,
who were then murdered in a nearby forest.)
The controversy over the exhibition once again underscores the double
standard by which wartime Germany is routinely regarded. In contrast to the
heavy stress by politicians and the media on victims of the Third Reich,
especially Jewish Holocaust victims, there is comparative silence about
victims of the Allies, especially those of America's wartime partner, the
This deceitful and defamatory travelling atrocity circus could only have
attained the gravitas it did with the thoughtless or cowardly co-operation
of German historians and politicians. They knew, or should have known, how
fundamentally fraudulent this exhibit was, but many Germans today keep their
mouths shut out of fear of being labelled a "revisionist," "nationalist," or
As Budapest historian Ungváry says, "I find this very worrisome, and it is
unfortunate that no one does anything about this in Germany." The
influential German daily The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper
wrote that the revelations highlighted the "intellectual climate" in today's
Germany, which made possible a propagandistic enterprise with such
prestigious backing. On another occasion the daily newspaper commented: "The
abundance of the exhibition organisers' errors, mistakes and negligence,
proven by researchers, is devastating. One is at a loss for words,
considering that this is about such a serious subject. One comes across
something comparable only in government- organised misinformation campaigns."
"Why didn't German historians expose the many mistakes and
misrepresentations in the Wehrmacht exhibition?" wrote the editor of the
German magazine Focus. "History professors provide an answer only when we
promise not to reveal their names: 'Every historian immediately saw just how
shoddy and slanted the exhibition was set up, but who has any desire to
allow himself to be publicly ruined?' The persecution of dissident thinkers
has had quite an impact."
Commenting on the exhibition controversy, Dr. Musial expresses some hope for
the future: "One does not really dare to question their views on scholarly
grounds. Whoever dares to tackle these things without qualms, as I have,
risks being labelled a revisionist? On the other hand, the tremendous
response to my work gives me hope that finally in Germany people will begin
to discuss, substantively and unhampered this chapter of contemporary
A Munich publisher, FZ-Verlag, recently issued a 416-page German-language
book about the Wehrmacht exhibition, Die Wahrheit über die Wehrmacht:
Reemtsmas Fälschungen widerlegt ("The Truth about the Wehrmacht:
Reemtsma's Frauds Debunked"). It is available from Deutscher Buchdienst,
Postfach 60 04 64, 81204 Munich, Germany.
HISTORIAN FINED FOR TELLING THE TRUTH
In Germany any statements that question the official view of the Holocaust
can bring legal persecution - and truth is no defence. German courts fined
best-selling British historian David Irving 30,000 marks (about $21,000) for
saying that a building in Auschwitz that had been portrayed for decades to
tourists as an extermination gas chamber is a "dummy" (Attrappe). It was
conceded however that Irving was right; the building had been built after
the war's end.
David Irving was found guilty of "disparaging the memory of the dead," a
German criminal code provision that effectively "protects" only Jews. The
judge refused to consider any of the evidence presented by Irving's
attorneys, including a plea to permit the senior curator and archives
director of the Auschwitz State Museum to testify in the case.
THEY EVEN HANGED A CHILD – ON HIS THIRTEENTH BIRTHDAY
British postwar Prime Minister Clement Atlee refused to interfere when a
military court sentenced a young German boy death by hanging. They – the
British – hanged him on the lad's thirteenth birthday. His crime? He kept a
picture of Hitler in his room?
WHO REALLY RAN BUCHENWALD?
In The Last 100 Days historian John Toland conceded that the
Communists, mostly Jews, were for years in almost complete control of the
German concentration camp at Buchenwald, 'as in many other camps.' (p.408).
The camp's mostly self-elected 'bureaucrats' administered all of the camp's
important functions from the inside. Petr Zenkl, a former inmate who was
later to become Lord Mayor of Prague, also admitted this. In fact Toland was
revealing nothing new but such is nevertheless blue-pencilled out by palace
journalists who recycle post-war propaganda of the allies.
In an American poll (October 3rd 1941) 90 per cent of the Catholic
hierarchy were opposed to the USA entering the war."