|
|
|
|
War Crimes US-type versus Friedrich Engel, Waffen-SS Officer The New Stürmer Year 2002 "Jesus and Hitler Told the Truth about the Jews." Dear kindred and fellow Aryans I anticipate you all have heard about Waffen-SS officer Friedrich Engel who earlier this week was found guilty in war crimes. Let us look at what Engel did on September 19, 1944. He commanded a troop of German soldiers, SD - security service - who shot 59 Italians because 6 German soldiers died in an attack on a cinema in Genoa. 15 German soldiers were wounded in the same attack. To the "cruelty" of Engel’s war crime, according to a court in Hamburg, Germany comes the fact that Italian civilians had to watch the shooting of the guerillas. Before we look further into Engel’s "crime-" Let us see how the occupation armies would have reacted if one of their soldiers were killed in Germany after 1945: French: Would have killed 25 hostages for each French soldier killed Soviets: Would have killed 50 hostages for each Soviet soldier killed USA: Would have killed 200 hostages for each US soldier killed. (§358 d, US Basic Field manual.)During WW2 Germany: Would kill 10 hostages for each German soldier. (The Hague Convention, predecessor to the Geneva Convention, provided rules of war for dealing with civilians who killed occupying soldiers. The civilian population was under the protection of the occupying power, however, a civilian who was fighting was considered a violation of the rules of war. In such an instance, the Hague Convention granted the occupying power the RIGHT to reprisal against the civilian population. The prescribed ratio was 10 civilians executed for each soldier murdered. however.) I ask you to remember that Italian guerrilla had coursed the death of 6 German soldiers and wounded 15. That was the reason for Friedrich Engel’s action towards the hostages. And Engel did not act on his own, the hostages had been picked after a German Court of the German Army, Wehrmacht, had okayed the shooting. Let us look at an US soldier, Bob Kerry. In 1969 Kerry a Marin Lieutenant in Viet Nam war commanded a unit which killed 60 civilians. Lieutenant Kerry was given the Congressional Medal of Honour, America’s highest During a mission in Viet Nam Lieutenant Kerry gave en order to kill defenceless women and children. Let us see what a soldier, Klann, told CBS reporters of "60 Minutes" on May 1, 2001 regarding the ordeal in Viet Nam:"Bob Kerry on the chest of a Vietnamese and I saw him take out his gun and shoot the old man. ... It was war, we were in a combat-zone - no one can question if the behaviour was right or wrong, or if we should wait for further orders. We did as we were ordered. 60 Minutes: "Was this in the village where Kerry said his unit was attacked?" Klann: "No!" 60 Minutes: "Did you hear any enemy shooting?" Klann: "No!!" 60 Minutes: "Could any sound in the vicinity have sounded like enemy shooting?! Klann: "No, that I remember. No!" Klann: "We rounded up the villagers and then we shot them. We slaughtered them. I remember a child, it cried after we stopped shooting. That child must have been alive." 60 Minutes: "What happened to the child?" Klann: "It was also shot, as all the others in the village" This was only one episode in Viet Nam; if I had space and time I could tell you thousands of episodes from Germany after WW2. Kerry was not prosecuted for the episode in Viet Nam, none of the US soldiers who killed German women, children and men after WW2 were ever prosecuted - Germany was a killing field for trigger happy Americans after WW2. No only Americans, but French, British and Soviet soldiers. War is cruel, no doubt about that, but we should not prosecute soldiers/officers for shooting hostages after terrorist-attacks. What we MUST prosecute and convict is attacks on non-armed civilians.There is no statute of limitations on war crime, consequently the US government could have convicted Lieutenant Kerry as late as "The US does not teach their officers the rules of war as given by the Geneva Convention." Had the US trained and taught their officers and soldiers about the Geneva Convention, they would not have been afraid of accepting the latest UN-proposal regarding an international court on war v\crimes. US gave the following reason for their veto against the International War Crime Tribunal: "US soldiers could be tried on war crimes during peace keeping missions." No other country has refused to accept the tribunal. Israel has not said what she think regarding the International War Crime Tribunal. She awaits USA’s decision. Why was Friedrik Engel convicted? The youth of Germany have started to look for ideals which can give them hope. Such ideals can not be found among today’s German politicians, Hoping to brake down the ideals of the past, the German lemmings prosecute their exceedingly old citizens, soldiers of their glorified army. Members of the German Wehrmacht, Waffen-SS are about to die out. The lemmings as ordered by Israel, want the public to stop looking on the once pride of Germany as heros.
How about prosecuting Ariel Sharon for Sabra and Schatila? Some months ago a Belgian Court wanted to indict Ariel Sharon for the war crimes committed in Sabra and Schatila. One Belgian judge has said Sharon can not be trailed in Belgium. On July 11, 2002 the Youth Union of the Norwegian Labour Party reported Ariel Sharon to the authorities. They hope he can be tried in Norway for war crimes in Sabra and Schatila and for the crimes against the Palestinians. Leading Norwegian politicians don’t think it is smart to try Sharon; they want negotiations. I don’t think any court in any country will or can convict a Jew of war crimes.
If Jewish audacity/swindle, Chuzpe, is right, then resistance must be a national duty. Heil og sael
|