Albert Einstein: A Jewish Myth
by Dr. Paul Bowers, B.S., M.E., Ch.D.
Albert
Einstein is held up by the Jewish liars as a rare genius who drastically changed
the field of theoretical physics. As such, he is made an idol to young people
and his very name has become synonymous with genius. The truth, however, is very
different. The reality is that Einstein was an inept, moronic Jew who could not
even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed nothing original to the field of
quantum mechanics or any other science, but on the contrary he stole the ideas
of other men and the Jewish media made him a hero.
When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his only
brilliance lies in his ability to plagiarize and steal other people's ideas,
passing them off as his own.
Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this story. The
Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education that he "showed
little scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of 15, "with poor
grades in history, geography, and languages, he left school with no diploma."
Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his "lack of imagination and
practical ability." In 1895,
He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying to get a position at a university, but without
success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the Jewish myth. Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were published in 1905. Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat,
including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any real education. However, a simpler explanation exists:
he stole the ideas and plagiarized the papers.
Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein's worshippers as totally new and completely different, each of which would change the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the following four ideas, respectively:
1. The foundation of the photon theory of light;
2. The equivalence of energy and mass;
3. The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
4. The special theory of relativity.
Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein called the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come in 1915). This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics and was based upon two premises: 1) in the absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same for all observers; and 2) since the speed of light is independent of the motion of its source, then the time interval between two events is longer for an observer in whose
frame of reference the events occur at different places than for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur in the same place. This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower velocities where time would pass faster.
James Maxwell
The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a third paper
published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed by the famous equation
E=mc^2. Einstein's biographers categorize this as "his most famous and most
spectacular conclusion." Even though this idea is an obvious conclusion of
Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it was not included in that paper but was
published as an afterthought later in the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass
equivalence was not original with Einstein. But again, it is not Einstein, but Wilhelm Wien and Max Planck who
deserve the credit. The main point of Einstein's paper, and the point for which
he is given credit, is that light is emitted and absorbed in finite
packets called quanta. This was the explanation for the photoelectric effect.
The photoelectric effect had been explained by Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and
others, including Philipp Lenard, worked on understanding this phenomenon.
Lenard was the first to show that the energy of the electrons released in the
photoelectric effect was not governed by the intensity of the light but by the
frequency of the light. This was an important breakthrough.
Math department in Göttingen where
Hilbert worked from 1895 until his retirement in 1930
The Jews did not want Max
Planck receiving the credit he deserved either. This German's grandfather and
great-grandfather had been important German theologians, and during World War II
he would stay in Germany throughout the war, supporting his fatherland the best
he could.
The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare genius, even
though he would go on to solidify quantum theory and contribute to it greatly,
as well as develop his famous uncertainty principle, in addition to describing
the modern atom and nucleus and the binding energies that are essential to
modern chemistry. No, the Jews did not want Heisenberg promoted as a genius
because he would go on to head the German atomic bomb project and serve prison
time after the war for his involvement with the Third Reich.
Look at this man!! Does he look as a smart man? This is
Einstein
This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis for modern
physics. But these two premises are far from being originally Einstein's. First
of all, the idea that the speed of light was a constant and was independent of
the motion of its source was not Einstein's at all, but was proposed by the
Scottish scientist James Maxwell. Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light
extensively and first proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature. He wrote
an article to
this effect for the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas
prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing
debate, the scientific community, particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley
reached the conclusion that the velocity of light was independent of the
velocity of the observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity
was known 27 years before Einstein wrote his paper.
This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to conduct an
important experiment, the results of which could not be explained by Newtonian
mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not
understand relativity. They had attempted to detect the motion of the earth
through ether, which was a medium thought to be necessary for the propagation of
light.
In response to this problem, in 1889, the Irish physicist George FitzGerald, who
had also first proposed a mechanism for producing radio waves, wrote a paper
which stated that the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment could be
explained if,
"... the length of
material bodies changes, according as they are moving through the ether or
across it, by an amount depending on the square of the ratio of their velocities
to that of light."
This is the theory of relativity, 13 years before Einstein's paper!
Henrik Antoon Lorentz
George Francis FitzGerald
Furthermore, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, from The Netherlands, proposed the same
solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the 1890's, both
Lorentz and FitzGerald worked on these ideas and wrote articles strangely
similar to Einstein's Special Theory detailing what is now known as the
Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction. In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down
equations explaining the Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction and its relativistic
consequences, 7
years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, Lorentz transformations, the series of
equations explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz. They describe the
increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the time dilation of a body
moving at speeds close to the velocity of light. In short, by 1904, everything
in Einstein's paper regarding the Special Theory of Relativity had already been
published.
The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of these
ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's paper that,
"... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals. The
simultaneity of two events or the order of their
succession, as well as the equality of two time intervals, must be defined in
such a way that the statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible."
Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the
similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein. Thus we see that
the only thing original about the paper was the term 'Special Theory of
Relativity.' Everything else was plagiarized. Over the next few years, Poincaré
became one of the most important lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but
he never, in any of his papers or speeches, mentioned Albert Einstein. Thus,
while Poincaré was busy bringing the rest of the academic world up to speed
regarding relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent office
in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it necessary to give much
credence or mention to Einstein's work. Most of these early physicists knew that
he was a fraud.
This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of another of
Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the irregular motion of a body
arising from the thermal energy of the molecules of the material in which the
body is immersed. The movement had first been observed by the Scottish botanist
Robert Brown in 1827. The explanation of this phenomenon has to do with the
Kinetic Theory of Matter, and it was the American Josiah Gibbs and the Austrian
Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not Albert Einstein. In
fact, the mathematical equation describing the motion contains the famous
Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men, they had explained by the 1890s
everything in Einstein's 1905 paper regarding Brownian motion.
Ludwig Blotzmann
Robert Brown
Josiah Gibbs
That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown in the
laboratory in the 1890s by both J.J. Thomsom of Cambridge and by W. Kaufmann in
Göttingen. In 1900, Poincaré had shown that there was a mass relationship for
all forms of energy, not just electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most probable
source of Einstein's plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most
brilliant, yet unappreciated physicists of the era. Hasenöhrl was the teacher of
many of the German scientists who would later become famous for a variety of
topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and energy for many
years and had published a paper on the topic in 1904 in the very same journal
which Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in 1905. For his brilliant
work in this area, Hasenörhl had received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious
Vienna Academy of Sciences.
Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy
was a simple deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish
physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the mathematical
relationship expressed by the equation E=mc^2 was the logical result of
Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it. Thus, the experiments of Thomson,
Kaufmann, and finally, and most importantly, Hasenörhl, confirmed Maxwell's
work. It is ludicrous to believe that Einstein developed this postulate,
particularly in light of the fact that Einstein did not have the laboratory
necessary to conduct the appropriate experiments.
In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to the scientific
community, "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies
whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium)." This
remark demonstrates how little Einstein understood about science, for this was
truly an outlandish remark. By saying this, Einstein showed that he really did
not understand basic scientific principles and that he was writing about a topic
that he did not understand. In fact, in response to this article, J. Precht
remarked that such an experiment "lies beyond the realm of possible experience."
The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the foundation of the
photon theory of light. Einstein wrote about the photoelectric effect. The
photoelectric effect is the release of electrons from certain metals or
semiconductors by the action of light. This area of research is particularly
important to the Einstein myth because it was for this topic that he unjustly
received his 1922 Nobel Prize.
Wilhelm Wien
Max Planck
Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern day quantum
theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based upon his and Wien's work, had shown that
radiated energy was absorbed and emitted in finite units called quanta. The only
difference in his work of 1900 and Einstein's work of 1905 was that Einstein
limited himself to talking about one particular type of energy - light energy.
But the principles and equations governing the process in general had been
deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself admitted that the obvious conclusion
of Planck's work was that light also existed in discrete packets of energy.
Thus, nothing in this paper of Einstein's was original.
After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific community took
little notice and Einstein continued his job at the patent office until 1909
when it was arranged for him to take a position at a school by World Jewry.
Still, it was not until a 1919 newspaper headline that he gained any notoriety.
With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a position where
he could begin to use other people's work as his own more openly. He engaged
many of his students to look for ways to prove the theories he had supposedly
developed, or ways to apply those theories, and then he could present the
research as his own or at least take partial credit. In this vein, in 1912, he
began to try and express his gravitational research in terms of a new, recently
developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding relativity. This was
the beginning of his General Theory of Relativity, which he would publish in
1915. But the mathematical work was not done by Einstein - he was
incapable of it. Instead, it was performed by the mathematician Marcel
Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical principles developed by Berhard
Riemann, who was the first to develop a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is
the basis of all mathematics used to describe relativity.
Berhard Riemann Marcel Grossmann
The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity to the
universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of planets and their orbits, and
the general principle that light rays bend as they pass by a massive object.
Einstein published an initial paper in 1913 based upon the work which Grossmann
did, adapting the math of Riemann to Relativity. But this paper was filled with
errors and the conclusions were incorrect. It appears that Grossmann was not
smart enough to figure it out for Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look
elsewhere to plagiarize his General Theory. Einstein published his correct
General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said prior to its publication that he,
"...completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert and Klein." He is referring to
David Hilbert, perhaps the most brilliant mathematician of the 20th century, and
Felix Klein, another mathematician who had been instrumental in the development
of the area of calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General Theory of
Relativity for Einstein.
David Hilbert 
Hilbert's tomb: Wir müssen wissen Wir werden wissen (We must know.
We will know)
Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to believe that
Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions regarding General
Relativity, and that he had influenced them in their thinking. However, the
exact opposite is true. Einstein stole the majority of his General Relativity
work from these two men, the rest being taken from Grossmann. Hilbert submitted
for publication, a week before Einstein completed his work, a paper which
contained the correct field equations of General Relativity. What this means is
that Hilbert wrote basically the exact same paper, with the same conclusions,
before Einstein did. Einstein would have had an opportunity to know of Hilbert's
work all along, because there were Jewish friends of his working for Hilbert.
Yet, even this was not necessary, for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in
advance of publishing his own. Both of these papers were, before being printed,
delivered in the form of a lecture.
Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert had
presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert
received a letter from Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of the
treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a
copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the
two men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance
copy of his. Therefore, this serves as incontrovertible proof that Einstein
quickly plagiarized the work and then presented it, hoping to beat Hilbert to
the punch. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began to belittle Hilbert,
even though in the previous summer he had praised him in an effort to get
Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert made the mistake of sending Einstein
this draft copy, but still he delivered his work first.
Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much higher quality
than Einstein's. It is known today that there are many problems with assumptions
made in Einstein's General Theory paper. We know today that Hilbert was much
closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper is the forerunner of the unified field
theory of gravitation and electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schrödinger,
whose work is the basis of all modern day quantum mechanics.
That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of the ideas
claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community all along. In 1940, a
group of German physicists meeting in Austria declared that "before Einstein,
Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc., had created the
foundations of the theory of relativity..."
However, the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The Jewish
media did not promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the
work of the Jew Albert Einstein. As we mentioned earlier, this General Theory,
as postulated by Hilbert first and in plagiarized form by Einstein second,
stated that light rays should bend when they pass by a massive object. In 1919,
during the eclipse of the Sun, light from distant stars passing close to the Sun
was observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence supported the
General Theory of Relativity, and the Jewish-controlled media immediately seized
upon the opportunity to prop up Einstein as a hero, at the expense of the true
genius, David Hilbert.
On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline of which
proclaimed, "Revolution in science - New theory of the Universe - Newtonian
ideas overthrown." This was the beginning of the force-feeding of the Einstein
myth to the masses. In the following years, Einstein's earlier 1905 papers were
propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the originator of all the ideas he
had stolen. Because of this push by the Jewish media, in 1922, Einstein received
the Nobel Prize for the work he had stolen in 1905 regarding the photoelectric
effect.
The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an important
coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had been established as an
idol to the popular masses of England and America, his image was promoted as the
rare genius that he is erroneously believed to be today. As such, he immediately
began his work as a tool for World Zionism. The masses bought into the idea that
if someone was so brilliant as to change our fundamental understanding of the
universe, then certainly we ought to listen to his opinions regarding political
and social issues. This is exactly what World Jewry wanted to establish in its
ongoing effort of social engineering. They certainly did not want
someone like David Hilbert to be recognized as rare genius. After all, this
physicist had come from a strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's
two middle names were 'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.' In
August of 1934, the day before a vote was to be taken regarding installing Adolf
Hitler as President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a proclamation in support of
Adolf Hitler, along with other leading German scientists, that was published in
the German newspapers. So the Jews certainly did not want David Hilbert
receiving the credit he deserved.
Max Planck
The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrödinger to be
heralded as a genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would go on to teach
at Adolf Hitler University in Austria, and he wrote a public letter expressing
his support for the Third Reich. This Austrian's work on the unified field
theory was a forerunner of modern physics, even though it had been criticized by
Einstein, who apparently could not understand it.
Werner Heisenberg
No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of white Germans,
Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and even Americans who had
contributed to the body of knowledge and evidence from which Einstein
plagiarized and stole his work. Instead, they needed to erect Einstein as their
golden calf, even though he repeatedly and often embarrassed himself with his
nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding the work he had supposedly done.
For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a front page article in
which Einstein gave an "emphatic denial" regarding the idea of practical
applications for the "energy of the atom." The article says,
"But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe that man
will someday be able to harness this boundless energy-to drive a great steamship
across the ocean on a pint of water, for instance-then, according to Einstein,
you are wrong..."
Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he had
supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time theoretical
research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear energy. But
after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he made no real attempts to
plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his real purpose - evangelizing for
the cause of Zionism and World Jewry. Though he did publish other articles after
this time, all of them were co-authored by at least one other person, and in
each instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with the research that led
to the articles; he was merely recruited by the co-authors in order to lend
credence to their work. Thus freed of the pretense of academia, Einstein began
his assault for World Zionism.
In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a fund-raising
tour for the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and to promote Zionism. In April of
1922, Einstein used his status to gain membership in a Commission of the League
of Nations. In February of 1923, Einstein visits Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June
of 1923, he becomes a founding member of the Association of Friends of the New
Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his Communist and Zionistic
activities to again embarrass himself scientifically by criticizing the work of
Schrödinger and Heisenberg. Following a brief illness, he resumes his Zionistic
agenda, wanting an independent Israel and at the same time a World Government.
In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war, although he would
reverse this position during World War II when he advocated war against Germany
and the creation of the atomic bomb, which he thought was impossible to build.
In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the request of other Jews, wrote two letters to
Roosevelt urging an American program to develop an atomic bomb to be used on
Germany - not Japan. Einstein would have no part in the actual construction of
the bomb, theoretical or practical, because he lacked the skills for either.
In December of 1946, Einstein rekindles his efforts for a World Government, with
Israel apparently being the only autonomous nation. This push continues
through the rest of the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein, who had been instrumental in
the creation of the State of Israel, both politically and economically, is
offered the presidency of Israel. He declines. In 1953, he spends his time
attacking the McCarthy Committee, and he supports Communists such as J. Robert
Oppenheimer. He encourages civil disobedience in response to the McCarthy
trials. Finally, on April 18, 1955, this filthy Jewish demagogue dies.
Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making stupid statements.
His death was just the beginning of his usage and exploitation by World Jewry.
The Jewish-controlled media continued to promote the myth of this Super-Jew long
after his death, and as more and more of the men who knew better died off, the
Jews were more and more able to aggrandize his myth and lie more boldly.
This brazen lying has culminated in the Jew controlled Time magazine naming
Einstein "The Person of the Century" at the close of 1999. It may be
demonstrated that the Jewish lies have become more bold with the passage of time
because Einstein was never named "Man of the Year" while he was alive, but now,
over forty years after his death, he is named "Person of the Century."
Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut choice for the "Person
of the Century," Adolf Hitler. Hitler was indeed named "Man of the Year" while
he was still living by Time magazine, and according to a December 27, 1999,
article in the USA Today, Einstein was chosen over Adolf Hitler because of the
perceived "nasty public relations fallout" that would accompany that choice; yet
in internet polling by Time, Hitler finished third and was the top serious
candidate. Still the issue of Time magazine dedicated to Einstein, which has
articles by men with names like Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and
Rosenblatt, is interesting to read. For one, they found it necessary to include
an article rationalizing why they did not pick the obvious choice, Adolf Hitler.
But more interesting is the article by Stephen Hawking which purports to be a
history of the theory of relativity. In it, Hawking admits many of the things in
this article, such as the fact that Hilbert published the General Theory of
Relativity before Einstein and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the concept
of relativity long before Einstein. Hawking also writes,
"Einstein...was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in Copenhagen,
Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrödinger in Zurich, who developed a new
picture of reality called quantum mechanics. ... Einstein was horrified by this
... Most scientists, however, accepted the validity of the new quantum laws
because they showed excellent agreement with observations ... They are the basis
of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology and electronics and the
foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the past
half-century."
This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits Einstein with all of the
modern developments that Hawking names, even through Einstein was so stupid as
to be vehemently against the most important idea of modern science, just as he
opposed Schrödinger's work in unified field theory which was far ahead of its
time. The same magazine admits that "success eluded" Einstein in the field of
explaining the contradictions between relativity and quantum mechanics. Today,
these contradictions are explained by the unified field theory, but Einstein,
who proves himself to be one of the least intelligent of 20th century
scientists, refused to believe in either quantum theory or the unified field
theory.
To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of the most ludicrous and
absurd lies of all time, yet it has been successfully pulled off by Isaacson,
Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and the Jewish owners of Time
magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to give the title to an inventor or
scientist, then the most obvious choice would have been men like Hilbert,
Planck, or Heisenberg. If they wanted to give it to the scientist who most
fundamentally changed the landscape of 20th century science, then the obvious
choice would be William Shockley. This Nobel prize winning scientist invented
the
transistor, which is the basis of all modern electronic devices and computers,
everything from modern cars and telephones, VCRs and watches, to the amazing
computers which have allowed incomprehensible advances in all fields of science.
Without the transistor, all forms of science today would be basically in the
same place that they were in the late 1940s.
However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to William Shockley because
he spent the majority of his scientific career demonstrating the genetic and
mental inferiority of non-whites and arguing for their sterilization. His
scientific, genetic views led the Jews to financially destroy Shockley who
founded the first company in the Silicon Valley, his hometown, to develop
computer chips. The Jews hired away his entire staff and used them to start
Fairchild
semiconductor, the company that today is known as Intel.
No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our time be
recognized, not the anti-Semite Henry Ford, not the great German scientists who
helped the National Socialists in Germany, not Charles Lindbergh, who was
sympathetic to National Socialist causes, and certainly not William Shockley,
one of the most brilliant physicists and geneticists of our time. Instead, the
Jews propped up the Zionist, Communist Albert Einstein who hated everything
white.
After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White Race and of
the Germans in particular in the following statements. He was asked what he
thought about Germany and about re-educating the Germans after the war and said,
"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since 1870...Behind the
Nazi party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book
and in his speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the possibility of
misunderstanding. ... The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war,
but they cannot be re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting..."
Einstein here is advocating the murder of Germans, because he feels that this is
the only way that they can be kept in check. He is right about one thing, the
Germans did knowingly support the cause of National Socialism, but what Einstein
is attacking is Christianity, because it was Christianity that led the German
people to overwhelmingly support National Socialism. It was the German Christian
Faith Movement and the Christian Social Party of men like Karl Lueger that led
the German people to their understanding of Jews. The Jew Daniel Goldhagen has
recently shown the Christian basis of National Socialism in his book, Hitler's
Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, and the book Why The
Jews? by Prager and Telushkin similarly proves the Christian origins of what the
Jews call 'anti-Semitism.' Einstein understood this and Einstein, like all Jews,
hated Christianity. So what Einstein was really advocating was the killing and
constraining of all true Christians, not just German Christians. This is the
true purpose and intent of Zionism and the demagogue Einstein was merely a tool
of World Zionism and Jewry towards this end.
The Jew Daniel Goldhagen
Zionistic Jews understand that true, primitive Christianity is the mortal enemy
of mongrel Judaism. This is why the Jews, like Einstein, hated Hitler's Germany
so much, for National Socialist Germany advocated primitive, positive
Christianity in the 24th point of its Party Platform.
For more information, contact: CSCS, P.O. Box 188, Kodak, TN 37764
Return to Top of Other Interesting Topics